That is a pretty stupid lawsuit. I wonder how a judge or prosecutor could allow this case to be tried in a court of law.

Paul

Eat Well. Live Well.
PurpleGreenPops.com

I guess you have to make a living somehow. Why do juries listen to this stuff?

Have a terrific day.
Comedy Pluss last blog post..Awards and Other Stuff

How about that jerk who sued McDonalds and Burger King becuase he was over weight that fact he didnt have to eat there but was still spupid and greedy enough to file his stupid lawsuit,his lawsuit was dimissed but in my opnion he should be sent to a gym and run the treadmill for 3 hours fed on bread and water

Thanks for such information put your more posts on this subject, people will get the benefit.
Thanks once again and keep it up.

I can see how the pet would be considered a liability. I'm sure the judge would tell her that there are other forms of public transportation she could take with the dog.

Lawsuits are only limited by the ability to pay for services. Interestingly I bet republicans which are the leading anti-lawsuit people are most likely to file frivolous lawsuits, because they have the money and can afford to do so.

I'm sure the judge would tell her that there are other forms of public transportation she could take with the dog.

Law suits like these are ridiculous. If you don't like the rules don't opt for their service… don't attempt to sue for millions of dollars you will never get.

Hmmmm… this one is tricky. We have to consider the argument of the old lady for her own protection but the difficult part here is the safety of other passengers in the subway.

Amazing what people will sue over these days.

A sheer waste of time and money. It is better to avoid things that you don't find comfortable rather than challenging others safety.

Poor woman suffers from low self esteem and needs a dog to terrorise other people into noticing her!

I just wonder if she has won the case.. hmmm? Anyone got a follow-up on this post?

My gut feel says that she lost.